Home / Notes / ISRG

ISRGIntuitive Surgical · quarterly notes

“When a hospital trades in an Xi for a DV5, the same program slot gives 11% more procedures a quarter.”

The Xi-to-DV5 replacement cycle is a growth avenue for five more years, on 85% recurring revenue, with no debt.

Written
2026-09-02
First published
2026-10-27
Position that day
Held
Archived copy
PDF, v11 version
  • v1 · 2026-09-02current As first written. 6 pages · 0.5 MB · SHA-256 8a9a466675c0157e7299bd6ee1ff2916b0127ecbc382cc22c17d46ce412953b0 · archived ↗
Wayback ↗

The decision, step by step

  1. 1
    Entry · 30 Mar 2026

    Started legging in

    While researching the medtech sector.

  2. 2
    2 Sep 2026

    Q2 FY2026 notes completed

    The replacement cycle carries the growth, and the balance sheet is pure optionality:

    • 85% recurring revenue; no debt; cash is 25% of total assets
    • Trade-ins up from 67 in Q1’25 to 144 in Q2’26
    • An Xi traded in for a DV5 gives the same program slot 11% more procedures a quarter
    • Open question: pricing (EUP), on the Q3 call
  3. 3
    Now · registered 20 Oct 2026

    Three tests that would put the thesis under review

    1. I&A revenue per procedure down more than 5% year on year without faster procedure growth, for two quarters (from 2027 through Q4 2028)
    2. Fewer than 100 trade-ins a quarter for two quarters, before the end of 2028
    3. US procedures per system flat or down year on year for two quarters, through Q4 2027

    Starting points, Q2’26: about $1,830 of I&A per da Vinci procedure; 144 trade-ins; US utilization +3%. First reading with the Q3 2026 results.

Handwritten notebook page on Intuitive Surgical: benign procedures outside the US, competition, remanufacturing and the EUP pricing challenge
Source page · benign procedures outside the US, competition and the EUP challenge

The note

i filing · ii management · iii third party · H my calculation · quotes from my call notes

The quarter: P&L, balance sheet, valuation

Revenue by type, not by platform · Q2 2026 i
Revenue by type Q2’26, $m YoY Share
Instruments and accessories (I&A) 1,735 +18% 60%
Systems 685 +19% 24%
Services 472 +21% 16%
Total 2,892 +19% 100%

Recurring revenue is $2.47b, 85% of the total. ii Product revenue (I&A and systems) is 84% of the total and grew 18.1% in the quarter; services are 16% and grew 20.8%. H

Margins H
Q2’26 H1’26 Q2’25 H1’25
Gross margin 68% 67% 66.3% 65.5%
Operating margin 33.6% 32% 30.5% 28.2%
Cash from operations ex SBC and working capital / revenue — 38.3% — 34.6%
  • No debt, and cash is 25% of total assets: pure optionality. H
  • Goodwill is 2.8% of total assets: an organic compounder. H
  • Shares: 352.3m in ’24, 356.6m in ’25, 355.1m in ’26. i
  • At $380, the normalized P/E on Q2’26 is 41.6×. H
  • The free cash flow yield is 3.2% at $380. Net of cash (380 less 25% = $285), it is 4.2%. H

Growth by line and geography

Newest quarter on the left, as in the notebook; FY’25 boxed in the notes H
YoY growth Q2’26 Q1’26 FY’25 Q3’25 Q2’25 Q1’25
I&A revenue +17.7% +23.3% +18.5% +20.1% +18.5% +18%
Systems +19.2% +24.5% +25.8% +32.7% +28.2% +58%
Services +20.8% +19.5% +20.2% +20.4% +23.3% +17%
I&A revenue, US (68% of I&A revenue) +16.0% +16.4% +15.9% +17.4% +14.1% +17.2%
I&A revenue, outside the US (19.2% of total revenue) +21.4% +39.8% +25% +27% +29.4% +20%

59.2% of the business, systems and services (about 40%) plus I&A outside the US (19.2%), is growing at about 20% year on year, while I&A in the US is growing at about 16%. H

Net income attributable to the China joint venture (noncontrolling interest): $5.1m in Q2’26, $4.5m in Q1’26 and $20.6m in FY’25, after $14.9m in ’24 and $19.3m in ’23. i

Placements, platforms, installed base

Q2 placements: 468. That is 246 DV5, 38 SP, 64 Xi R, 58 X and 62 Xi; 114 of them with a dual console, which generates a moat: training capacity. ii US placements went from 216 in Q2’25 to 267 in Q2’26: 27 greenfield systems at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs); otherwise, almost entirely upgrades to DV5.

X and Xi R bracketed together in the notes as “land and expand” · fleet of 11.7K ii
Platform Generation Year Note Placed in Q2’26 Installed
da Vinci Xi 4th 2014 Core installed base; flagship multiport; legacy 62
da Vinci X 4th 2017 De-featured, so affordable 58 (49 a year ago)
da Vinci Xi R 4th 2025 Refurbished Xi 64 (10 a year ago) 130
da Vinci SP 4th 2018 38 445
da Vinci 5 5th 2024 Force feedback; 10,000× the compute 246 1,700
Ion Own architecture 2019 Lung biopsy, not surgery 55 (+21%) 1,096
  • Higher utilization of DV5 than of Xi. ii
  • System utilization is the metric in the US: it grew 3% in Q2, a “healthy level”. ii
  • Management: “distributor markets have responded well”. That is, Intuitive acquired its European distributor, apparently to take the distributor’s share, as those businesses had been responding well. ii

The replacement cycle and trade-ins

From Si to Xi took seven years, with peak trade-ins in 2024. From Xi to DV5, 2024 to around 2031: a growth avenue for five more years.

DV5 placements: 352 in ’24, 870 in ’25, 230 in Q1’26 and 246 in Q2’26. That is 1.7K of an 11.7K fleet (14.5%); with 445 SP, DV5 and SP together are 18.3%. The rest, 11.7K less DV5 and SP, is about 9,565 fourth-generation and older systems; ASCs and hospital outpatient departments may stay on the fourth generation. H

Trade-ins per quarter ii
Q2’26 Q1’26 Q4’25 Q3’25 Q2’25 Q1’25
Trade-ins 144 119 146 141 83 67

Trade-in velocity is accelerating, for three reasons: the DV5 ASP credit; Xi R, refurbishing traded-in systems for resale to ASCs; and the utilization uplift.

Xi R started a year ago: 130 sold, 50 in the US, 20 at ASCs, in 11 to 12 countries. ii A fourth-generation ecosystem, affordable, gives access to customers not yet in robotics, and then, perhaps, upside.

When a hospital trades in an Xi for a DV5, the same program slot gives 11% more procedures a quarter: growth even with the base stalled.

Why? Management says it is because of what the systems are. I want to check whether it is also where they sit, and whether the +11% holds once the flagship accounts have already upgraded.

The capex cycle

The investor concern: bad debt might build at hospitals as people fall off ACA and Medicaid coverage. The response: US system placements were healthy in Q2, up 24% year on year, and about 70% were acquired under leasing arrangements, which gives hospitals more flexibility under capital constraints. ii

Hospitals typically buy systems ahead of rising demand. That is not the case now: they are not expanding the installed base.

Leasing mix and revenue quality

Operating leases as a share of all placements: 48% in 2023, 51% in 2024, 49% in 2025 and 54% in Q2’26, a very recent uptick. Of these, 57% are usage-based leases, paid as procedures are performed: less predictability, but more skin in the game and more upside as more indications are cleared. Not just an annuity. ii

Usage-based is not the fastest-growing lease type: fixed-payment operating leases grew 55% in H1 year on year, against 7.8% for usage-based. Sales-type leases: 23 in H1’26, against 16 in H1’25. i

Since 2025, property, plant and equipment includes the systems leased to customers, to support the leasing business: previously in operating activities, now in investing activities. i

Pricing: the EUP thread

To watch in the coming quarters, in 2027: whether EUP, the Extended Use Program, starts to push I&A revenue per procedure down.

If, through EUP, Intuitive gets incremental volume in lower-acuity procedures, spending there the pricing gains from premium procedures such as force feedback (FFB), DV5 and SP, the strategy can work if volume elasticity really shows up. So we may see a scenario where I&A revenue per case is stable or falling while benign procedures accelerate in H2’27. Here Intuitive is cutting prices where entrants such as Hugo and Ottava are going to attack, and where remanufacturers are trying to enter with their refurbished instruments.

The EUP challenge: forgone replacement revenue, recovered through volume elasticity, retention and laparoscopic share gains. The test: revenue per procedure against benign-procedure growth.

I&A revenue per procedure: $2,200 for Ion (Q3 and Q4 ’25 calls), $1,830 for da Vinci (Q2’26). ii Management lists Ion and DV5 growth as offsets to product cost reduction.

As calculated H
Revenue per system, a year
About 300 procedures × $1,830 of I&A per procedure $549K
Service per system $145K
Revenue per system $694K
× 12,806 da Vinci and Ion systems $8.9b
Against the ’25 10-K $8.5b

Benign procedures, seasonality, outside the US

Procedures outside the US are 38% of the total (37.9%): 340K of 900K globally. Benign procedures are 25% of those (Q2 call), about 85K, so 75% is complex oncology. Benign procedures outside the US are 9.5% of global volume, and they grew 37% in Q2’26 (Q2 call). ii

System placements are seasonal: up in Q4, down in Q1. More than 50% of da Vinci procedures are benign, and benign procedures are more seasonal than cancer or other life-threatening ones: up in Q4, down in Q1.

Competition, antitrust, remanufacturing

  • Antitrust: no antitrust injunction can override FDA clearance for third parties.
  • Restore Robotics: on March 31, ’26, clearance to remanufacture two more Xi instruments, after a March ’25 clearance for Restore scissors. Restore’s clearances cover 4 I&A out of more than 100 EndoWrist SKUs (made obsolete by the platform transition), all on Xi, while Intuitive’s growth comes from DV5 and SP. iii
  • The clearance process costs $100K–$250K and takes 6 to 7 months per SKU. iii
  • Intuitive still hasn’t followed the printer pathway (managed print services) or the aviation one (parts manufacturer approval), which bundle service and asset into one toll. Intuitive’s is only a system lease, with I&A apart.
  • None of the competitors has force feedback. FFB clearances are expanding, with cardiac FFB instruments to follow: multi-year differentiation.
  • Bariatric procedures were 4–5% of da Vinci procedures (Q3’23 call) and are below 3% (Q3’25 call): GLP-1 is not a threat. ii

Tariff exposure

Where the tariff exposure sits ii
Country Exposure
Mexico I&A
Germany, Bulgaria Endoscopes
China Materials
Malaysia New facility

What I watch

  • The four readings, every quarter: I&A revenue per procedure, trade-ins per quarter, US system utilization growth, usage-based lease revenue growth.
  • EUP: what management says on the Q3 call, and in 2027 whether it starts to push I&A revenue per procedure down.
  • Whether the +11% holds once the flagship accounts have upgraded.
  • Early signs of M&A: Intuitive tends to buy IP early and cheap, then spends R&D on it internally.
  • Still tracking: the new GI treatment robot (early stage, not commercial); product mix across Xi, SP, DV5, Xi R and Ion; Ion and DV5 growth as offsets to product cost reduction.
  • The three tests that would put the thesis under review (step 3).

Position on the day of publication: held. I don’t trade against a published view in the 72 hours after publishing it, except to carry out a pre-stated exit or risk limit. Not investment advice.